I really have to clean up my act. I spend way, way too much time on the internet interacting in a bunch of forums with - what I hope are - like minded souls. On the one hand, in the main my fellow forumites are friendly, empathetic souls I can discuss all kinds of topics with. The DVD.Reviewer and MyReviewer forums are wonderful places for a chat, although I have to admit that for a good old-fashioned, nerdy technical discussion they leave quite a bit to be desired. But then that's why I also frequent other forums. Most of them are friendly as well, but there are one or two where one has to tread extremely carefully so as not to upset the insiders.

My current domestic situation keeps me from a full and proper social life - I have to be available 24/7 as a carer, and I would not trust the local social services to adequately tend to the needs of a house brick. So for me, the internet is a valuable social tool.

For the naysayers who would argue that face-to-face social interaction is much better than the remote interaction of the internet, I would say that you get no argument from me, but I think interaction on the internet has to be carried out far more carefully and diplomatically than face-to-face because there are no physical cues such as tone-of-voice or body language to rely on.

This is, of course, where the problem lies. A great many forum users don't particularly give much thought to communicating tone and intent other than through the use of smileys or other emoticons. Either that or they're just plain bloody rude.

I find industry insiders the worst. No names, no pack drill, but you can assume I mean the film/television/DVD industry. They're a fascinating, knowledgeable, expert resource to interact with, as long as you stay on the right side of them. But if you make a statement that they see as presumptuous - displaying knowledge they don't think you as an industry outsider should have - they'll shoot you down in flames. And in the most belittling, condescending, arrogant manner possible. And it'll usually be either a semantic matter or a viewpoint that they don't think is worth the time of day.

I'm not an advocate of starting a fight and getting banned from a site. I'm more inclined to log off and go away to cool down, or occasionally vent my spleen elsewhere. Hence this blog.

I'm sitting here, staring out at a lovely sunny Sunday afternoon in September, wondering why I spend so much time on forums. I suppose I'm lucky I haven't got hooked on chatrooms, Twitter, Facebook and the rest. While I'm dispensing my pearls of wisdom and wit (occasionally to swine) on the internet, I could be getting on with writing my novels, doing the garden, cleaning the toilet or any number of more rewarding activities.

I need to get out more.

Posted by Mark Oates

Comments on this Item

Add Your Own Comment

Come on in!  Sit yourself down and cut yourself a slice of cake!*

After nine years and three months stinking out DVDReviewer, I've decided it's time for a change of scenery and a change of web presence.

Over that past nine years, I've probably been on DVDReviewer at least once a day, and I've seen it change.  I've seen familiar names come and go, colleagues join the magic band of pixies that write the reviews none of the forumites ever read, and other colleagues wander off to do something more interesting after a while.

DVDReviewer has always been a special place on the web for me.  It was never as hostile as AICN (what is?), as snooty as DVDTimes, as insidery as Roobarb's or as anal as the Home Theater Forum.  All right, so you couldn't have a good techy discussion without somebody threadfarting a nerd alert or hijacking the thread to discuss the football, but it was always a friendly, chummy sort of place where you could share your troubles and there was always a sympathetic ear.

Was. 

I'm hoping that the spirit of the old DVDReviewer can be found here at MyReviewer and the Sprocket Hole.  I'm going to concentrate all of my efforts on making more frequent blog entries and on a wider range of topics than just DVDs and old movies and television.  I'm still going to write the odd review - the odder the better - and make passing comment on current affairs. All the sorts of things I used to do on the DVDReviewer forums.  That will include the very occasional obituary in tribute to a personally respected personality which had better not degenerate into a series of catty and irrelevant comments about one role in their career.

*"Sit yourself down and cut yourself a slice of cake" was something of a catchphrase for my old maternal great-grandfather.  Whenever one of my grandad's sisters would bring home a feller, he'd greet them with the line, and chortle to himself as the unfortunate suitor would look around for the non-existent cake.

I come from a long line of nutters.

Posted by Mark Oates

Comments on this Item

Click a Page Number below to view more comments!

Add Your Own Comment

Say hello to my leedle friend.

This is currently my favourite toy. The Sony E-Reader PRS-505. About the same size and weight as an A5 Diary, it is for an old sci-fi whore like me, the implementation of The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy. The only thing missing from the beige, faux-leather outer cover are the words "Don't Panic" in large, friendly letters, and that is the work of five minutes with a pack of self-adhesive letters.

Electronic Book Readers are a growing breed of devices that promise to change the way we read. There are, so far, a handful of first or second generation devices on the market. The most advanced of the breed, Amazon's Kindle, in any of its incarnations is typically unavailable outside the US. The main reason for this is the device's Wi-Fi operability - the device downloads content directly from the web via Whispernet. A similar deal in the UK would have to be brokered with somebody like 3 Mobile, and a UK-specific model of the reader would have to be manufactured so there's probably more likelihood of Miss Piggy breaking the sound barrier. At around $350, (£300ish), the Kindle is also the most pricey of the electronic book readers.

The closest competitors come in around the £200 mark, which makes the technology still fairly pricey but within the scope of other similar gadgetry like PDAs, GPS and the like. Of the competitors, the most widely available in the UK is the Sony E-Reader PRS-505. All the usual suspects carry stocks, with Play.com currently offering the best price of £179.99 - although they no longer offer the external PSU as a freebie which they were doing up to a week or so ago. The PSU will now set you back around £30, but it does mean you can charge the reader in two hours rather than four and you can use it while charging which you can't if you charge via the USB cable.

As regards looks, the Sony E-Reader comes with solid aluminium bodywork which makes the device feel really robust. The controls are pretty simple - a spring-loaded slide on/off switch on the top (similar to an MP3 player, you cock it like a gun rather than switching it on or off). Ten menu buttons down the right hand side of the display, two sets of page-turn buttons forwards and backwards on the front of the reader, a zoom button for changing font sizes and a bookmark button. There's also a straightforward up-down-left-right-and-enter control button on the front of the reader. On the bottom edge of the device is the mini USB connector, the PSU socket and a socket and rocker volume control for a pair of earphones as the E-Reader also plays MP3s. You can read and listen to music at the same time.

The basic model E-Reader in plain silver looks terrific, but there is a designer scarlet version available from John Lewis for about £225.

The BeBook is the closest competitor to the Sony E-Reader, although reports of the build quality are disappointing in comparison. The BeBook has a black plastic body compared to the Sony's metal. At £230, it's pricier than the Sony, but can handle a few more file formats. The device itself is a rebadge of the Chinese Hanlin E-Book Reader.

There are a couple of other devices, but they are harder to get hold of, and tend to be more expensive as well.

All of them have the air of Captain Picard's PADD - a smallish (six-inch) display using the new E-Ink technology. The E-Ink display has the look and feel of one of those "magic pad" drawing toys - a sticky translucent sheet on a slightly oily black backing - when you drew on the film, it stuck where you had pressed to the black backing. When you wanted to start again, you peeled the film off the backing again and the image "magically" vanished. You don't of course peel off the E-Ink display, but it has the same light-grey look. Contrast levels with E-Ink have been one of the problems inherent in the technology, with a "paper-white" display still not achievable. Some early adopters have bemoaned the lack of a backlight on the display, but the inclusion of a backlight would negate the power-savings made by the E-Ink display. A colour display is also a while away.

Battery-life is the big eye-opener of the electronic book readers. Because E-Ink only requires power to redraw the display, the battery life is talked about in page-turns rather than hours. The Sony and the BeBook - its closest competitor - both have battery charges of around 7000 page-turns (or War and Peace five times cover to cover). In practice, the battery seldom seems to discharge fully, as it tops up to full capacity fairly rapidly while transferring content over the USB link.

I'd hate to get into an Egon-Spengler-type argument that "Print Is Dead", because it obviously isn't - the paperless office never happened (if anything the reverse happened), and if you're absolutely honest the E-Reader emulates the whole reading-off-paper paradigm rather than being some whiz-bang screen-graphic experience.

The great thing about the E-Reader is that you can put a ton (literally) of content on the thing, and depending on your reading tastes cheaply or completely free. According to Sony's own blurb, their E-Reader has a capacity of 160 eBooks. That's undoubtedly eBooks in Sony's proprietorial file formats LRF and LRX, because I've managed to pack 320 eBooks on to my E-Reader in a combination of ePUB and RTF formats, and I still have around 50Mb of the 210Mb capacity free. In anybody's money, 320 books would make anybody's book shelves creak.

And that's just the internal flash memory. On the top edge of the device, next to the on/off switch, are two memory card slots - an SD card slot which can take up to a 2Gb card, and a Sony Memory Stick Pro Duo slot rated up to 16Gb - which would roughly be 32,000 books based on my average file sizes.

The E-Reader hooks up to your computer using a USB 2.0 cable, which enables it to charge up fully in four hours, and which keeps the permanent Li-Ion battery topped up fully when you upload books to the device. Your computer sees the device as three removable drives - the internal memory, the SD card slot and the MS card slot.

When you get the E-Reader, it comes with Library software which enables you to load eBook files on to the device. It also interfaces with Sony's E-Book store in the US, but only if you live there. UK residents have to deal with Waterstone's. Also in the box is a CD of 100 Classic books (in LRF format) - everything from Aesop's Fables to the Works of William Shakespeare. The device itself comes preloaded with three or four books (a thriller and a couple of Mills and Boon romances and a few excerpts from other books) to get you started.

Sony has a deal with Waterstone's for buying content for the E-Reader, but the eBook prices are very close or identical to the price of the printed book which might put some people off.

You can, however, fill the E-Reader for free if you know where to look. There are a number of digital libraries on the web, offering copyright lapsed works and public domain works. If you fancy boning up on the classics, for instance, you can do that for free. For my money, the best free book resource on the web is Project Gutenberg - the original electronic library. Wiki it.

Like music and movies, there are also bootlegs of more modern, copyrighted works if you know where to look, but I'm not telling you.

You can also read PDFs on the E-Reader, but print sizes can look pretty weird, and the layout can go completely bananas. Heavily illustrated documents such as instruction books cannot be zoomed satisfactorily and subsequently are difficult to read. I'm inclined to convert PDFs to plain text whenever possible and then reformat them in RTF format.

What really gets my creative juices flowing is the prospect of using the device as a proofreader for my own writings. Suddenly I don't need to hunch over a computer screen to read my writings back, or print out reams of paper. I can simply drag and drop the file (in RTF format, which I can set Word to use as the default file format). As long as I size the text to 16 to 18pt, it appears on the E-Reader perfectly. You can, of course size the text smaller, but the smaller the text the harder it is to read. Given the battery life of the E-Reader and the ease of use, it's a closer experience to reading a book than reading text off a screen.

Posted by Mark Oates

Comments on this Item

Add Your Own Comment